Medical Devices

Description

In this task force, high-level experts in this field discuss the latest developments in the regulatory framework for medical devices. They exchange key insights and interpretations of the EU medical devices framework and identify areas where the BioMed Alliance can provide input and expertise to enhance the safety of medical devices in Europe. They also explore opportunities for reaching out to key stakeholders and organisations in the medical devices field, both within Europe and beyond.

Chair

This task force is chaired by Prof. Alan Fraser and Prof. Per Kjærsgaard-Andersen.

 

Board Representative

The Board Representative for the Committee is Prof. Sanja Kolaček.

 

Highlights

Biomed Alliance response to the Call for Evidence on Medical devices and In Vitro Diagnostics – targeted revision of EU rules
News

Biomed Alliance response to the Call for Evidence on Medical devices and In Vitro Diagnostics – targeted revision of EU rules

On 6 October 2025, the BioMed Alliance submitted its response to the European Commission’s call for evidence regarding the targeted revision of the Medical Devices Regulation (MDR) and the In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR). While the Alliance welcomes the Commission’s goals to safeguard patient safety and support innovation, it also highlights challenges that must be addressed to ensure continued patient access to safe, effective, and innovative technologies. The Alliance highlights several recommendations, including the neeed to ensure stronger central coordination at the EU level.  
New CORE-MD recommendations on strengthening clinical evidence for high-risk medical devices
News

New CORE-MD recommendations on strengthening clinical evidence for high-risk medical devices

On 15 September 2025, the CORE-MD (Coordinating Research and Evidence for high-risk Medical Devices) consortium published new expert recommendations in The Lancet Regional Health Europe on how to improve clinical investigations of high-risk medical devices in the EU. The report is a key outcome of the CORE-MD project, which the BioMed Alliance contributed to as a partner and which concluded in 2024. The recommendations aim to address significant gaps in the evaluation of high-risk technologies, including cardiovascular implants, orthopedic devices, and diabetes management systems. Key recommendations include:
  • A four-stage framework for clinical investigations, from initial studies through to long-term follow-up.
  • Greater use of randomised controlled trials, including sham-controlled trials with appropriate ethical safeguards.
  • Efficient large-scale trials embedded in registries to accelerate evidence generation.
  • Mandatory transparency of study design, protocols, and results.
  • Tailored approaches for breakthrough or orphan devices, requiring post-market confirmatory studies.
The full article is available here: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/LANEPE/article/PIIS2666-7762(25)00252-2/fulltext
Users of medical devices call for urgent reform to EU Medical Devices Regulation (MDR)
News

Users of medical devices call for urgent reform to EU Medical Devices Regulation (MDR)

Today, the BioMed Alliance, together with the European Patients Forum (EPF), the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP), and the European Hospital and Healthcare Federation (HOPE), published a joint open letter urging the European Commission to address critical shortcomings in its revision of EU Medical Devices Regulation (MDR). While we welcome the intended purpose of the Regulation to enhance safety of devices in Europe, there are certain issues that must be addressed including a lack of pathways for orphan and breakthrough devices, limited transparency, and limited coordination and oversight.  In a letter addressed to President Ursula von der Leyen and Commissioner Olivér Várhelyi, the four organisations representing medical societies, patients, hospital pharmacists and hospitals outline three urgent priorities for the targeted revision of the MDR. These build on previous recommendations of the respective organisations and reflect a shared commitment to improving the EU regulatory landscape for medical devices: 
  • Clarify clinical evidence requirements and make clinical evidence public  
  • Improve consistency and create a central body for scientific co-ordination  
  • Improve coordination to address safety issues  
A targeted reform is necessary to ensure the system is science-driven, transparent, and responds to patients’ and healthcare professionals’ needs.   
Join Us for a Workshop on the Future Directions for EU Medical Devices & IVD Regulations!
Event

Join Us for a Workshop on the Future Directions for EU Medical Devices & IVD Regulations!

Join us for an in-depth workshop focused on the key challenges surrounding the implementation of the Medical Devices Regulation (MDR) and In-Vitro Diagnostics Regulation (IVDR), particularly in light of the ongoing evaluation process. This event will bring together key stakeholders from across the medical devices landscape to engage in meaningful discussions. We will explore critical issues such as limitations in clinical evaluation, challenges associated with the use of in-house IVDs, and the reduced availability of essential devices in Europe. In addition to expert presentations, the workshop will feature interactive roundtable discussions where participants will collaborate to identify solutions on the way forward. The event will be followed with a networking cocktail! Register here!
New statement advocates for a balanced approach to phasing out PFAS
Statement

New statement advocates for a balanced approach to phasing out PFAS

In a new statement, BioMed Alliance provides insight on the harmful impacts of Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and urges manufacturers of medical devices to find safe alternatives whilst ensuring that essential devices don’t disappear from the market. The statement advocates for a balanced approach for the phasing out of PFAS by advocating for research on finding alternatives as well as facilitating the use of exemptions for a limited time period in order to avoid the loss of medical devices from the market.
New statement raises awareness on urgent deadline to avoid medical devices from disappearing
Statement

New statement raises awareness on urgent deadline to avoid medical devices from disappearing

In a new statement, BioMed Alliance highlights its concerns regarding an imminent deadline in the Medical Devices Regulation (MDR), which will manufacturers have to meet to keep their devices on the market. It is foreseeable that devices may be withdrawn from the European market in the coming period, which could lead to shortages of medical devices. As of 26 May 2024, manufacturers will be required to meet a critical deadline for legacy devices, in order to benefit from the extended transition periods. By this date, they will need to have applied for conformity assessment under the new regulation with a notified body, and have a MDR Quality Management System (QMS) in place. Due to several reasons including the high costs of certification, manufacturers may decide not to apply for MDR and their devices will thus not benefit from the extended transition period after the 26th of May. Particularly devices for small patient groups, such as paediatric and orphan devices may be affected. In response, the statement provides both short and long-term recommendations aimed at preventing the potential loss of medical devices.
Statement raising awareness on urgent deadline to avoid medical devices from disappearing
Statement

Statement raising awareness on urgent deadline to avoid medical devices from disappearing

In a new statement, BioMed Alliance highlights its concerns regarding an imminent deadline in the Medical Devices Regulation (MDR), which will manufacturers have to meet to keep their devices on the market. It is foreseeable that devices may be withdrawn from the European market in the coming period, which could lead to shortages of medical devices. As of 26 May 2024, manufacturers will be required to meet a critical deadline for legacy devices, in order to benefit from the extended transition periods. By this date, they will need to have applied for conformity assessment under the new regulation with a notified body, and have a MDR Quality Management System (QMS) in place. Due to several reasons including the high costs of certification, manufacturers may decide not to apply for MDR and their devices will thus not benefit from the extended transition period after the 26th of May. Particularly devices for small patient groups, such as paediatric and orphan devices may be affected. In response, the statement provides both short and long-term recommendations aimed at preventing the potential loss of medical devices.